Korona ..



"Unfortunately, so much is out of our control. But we are not called to a spirit of fear. I believe that we are called to a spirit of faith and it’s times like these that can bring the best out of us when we focus on the right things. "
---> Dr. Dan Sullivan




Excuse the language.. but.. this is pretty good.
George Carlin



Facts about Covid-19

Research/sourced facts




COVID-19: Restoring Public Trust During A Global Health Crisis




Investigate the CDC

https://standforhealthfreedom.com/action/investigate-the-cdc





The John’s Hopkins newsletter published raw data showing that COVID has not increased overall deaths AT ALL. Cancer is down, heart diseasedown, flu non existent, tuberculosis down, all for the first time in decades..... but COVID killed almost a half million in the US?!?! Sure it did🤦🏻‍♂️
Here is the original article removed:
and here the editorial they replaced it with.:
And here is another article explaining this cover up and the defaming of the original author:



Fun fact.
Hitler used IBM to create punch cards to track and identify people for genocide.
Our Government just hired IBM to create vaccine passports to track and identify people.
Those who can’t remember history will inevitably repeat it.

IBM and the Holocaust
The Strategic Alliance Between Nazi Germany and America's Most Powerful Corporation 
By EDWIN BLACK

The Nazi Party: IBM & “Death’s Calculator”


https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/ibm-and-quot-death-s-calculator-quot-2




The Rockefeller Foundation created the WHO & funds U.S. Public Health

Wow
https://libertygalaxy.com/rockefeller-globalism-using-health/?fbclid=IwAR3nlD2qkB5x66TzOXljHMVAKZEV4FWF__NJ0vlBHz89wei0-aY2DZqhvHw


London Real

londonreal.tv
-->To get some of the good stuff... that youtube decided was too good for us to see.





CDC study finds about 78% of people hospitalized for Covid were overweight or obese

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/08/covid-cdc-study-finds-roughly-78percent-of-people-hospitalized-were-overweight-or-obese.html?fbclid=IwAR14HZuPa5pI21bbqm8Scq31VKGIY4ZIx6hAZFL8HLrcf-93ChGAlLhQeWE



′ Covid-19 is not a random killer. Only people who have one of four chronic health problems likely to die from the virus, a major new study has confirmed.
The ′′ big four ′′ are heart disease, respiratory or kidney problems (kidney) or cancer, and these risks increase if the person is also obese or suffering from several of the diseases at the same time. Age also plays a role, but again only if the patient has one of four health problems."
Researchers at East Anglia University reviewed 52 studies involving more than 100,000 Covid patients to find that all four diseases were common in the most serious cases of Covid, whether they needed intensive care, respiratory assistance or they died.
Fuente: JAMA Network Open, 2021; 4: e213594





From Dr. Shiva ::: Covers a lot of important bases.






When it comes to Death tolls/reporting



This Event Was A Coordinated Last Ditch Effort By The [DS], Moves & Countermoves:Dr. Shiva






EXCLUSIVE Dr Rashid Buttar BLASTS Gates, Fauci, EXPOSES Fake Pandemic Numbers As Economy Collapses







How Could Fauci Predict a Coronavirus Turnaround After this Week?

--Dr. Dale Brown





All Eyes on Sweden





https://plandemicmovie.com/



Prof. Knut M. Wittkowski: "The epidemic is over"








Questioning Conventional Wisdom in the COVID-19 Crisis, with Dr. Jay Bhattacharya










Professor Knut Wittkowski - The Best Coronavirus Interview









Dr. Gerry Clum Discusses the Current COVID-19 Global Health Crisis with Dr. James Chestnut

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6cP-F0ckfs&t=37s




Former AIDS Scientist Judy Mikovits PhD EXPOSES Anthony Fauci,Dr Birx & UNCOVERS Medical Corruption






DOCTOR WHO PREDICTED COVID-19 ANSWERS ALL


Triple board-certified M.D., Dr. Zach, joins Del in an evolutionary discussion on why Coronavirus is here, what it’s trying to tell us, and how we emerge from the darkness.



Listen to her stuff:

Forever Debunking the Narrative With Prof Dolores Cahill










. 2020 May 13;106026.
 doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2020.106026. Online ahead of print.

A Study on Infectivity of Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Carriers

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32405162/?fbclid=IwAR3rxfWBJksR-F7yrPLMr1nGOIVgVychyxUqc8mRIwWClIj2lbDDBaCdV2s




Swiss policy research


https://swprs.org/

https://swprs.org/2018/10/01/covid-19-intro/

Presenting Characteristics, Comorbidities, and Outcomes Among 5700 Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 in the New York City Area

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2765184?guestAccessKey=906e474e-0b94-4e0e-8eaa-606ddf0224f5&utm_source=For_The_Media&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=ftm_links&utm_content=tfl&utm_term=042220

Used PCR tests
"The most common comorbidities were hypertension (3026, 56.6%), obesity (1737, 41.7%), and diabetes (1808, 33.8%). The median score on the Charlson Comorbidity Index was 4 points (IQR, 2-6), which corresponds to a 53% estimated 10-year survival and reflects a significant comorbidity burden for these patients. "

 "Mortality for those who received mechanical ventilation was 88.1% (n = 282). Mortality rates for those who received mechanical ventilation in the 18-to-65 and older-than-65 age groups were 76.4% and 97.2%, respectively. Mortality rates for those in the 18-to-65 and older-than-65 age groups who did not receive mechanical ventilation were 19.8% and 26.6%, respectively. There were no deaths in the younger-than-18 age group. The overall length of stay was 4.1 days "

The data is in — stop the panic and end the total isolation




UPDATED: Johns Hopkins Retracts Article Saying COVID-19 Has 'Relatively No Effect on Deaths' in U.S.



Conventional wisdom is that COVID-19 has caused thousands of deaths in the United States and nearly 1.5 million worldwide. This perception was directly challenged by an article published by Johns Hopkins University (JHU) on November 22. The article was later retracted because it “was being used to support false and dangerous inaccuracies about the impact of the pandemic,” according to JHU.




Could mass testing for Covid-19 do more harm than good?



Almost Every Hospitalized Coronavirus Patient Has Another Underlying Health Issue, According to a Study of New York Patients

https://time.com/5825485/coronavirus-risk-factors/?fbclid=IwAR2sjQd7t189SbOpF55IgxJNyesnNIccpdfXQsehucuOlBflKGrdYcnbnVg


"electronic health records data from 5,700 people with COVID-19 who had been admitted to hospitals within the Northwell Health system—which currently has the largest number of COVID-19 cases in the country—in the New York City area in March and early April. The median age of patients was 63 years old, and 94% of them had at least one comorbidity, meaning that they had at least one other disease in addition to COVID-19."
"Researchers then looked at outcome data from the 2,634 patients who eventually left the hospital, either because they had died or had been discharged. About 14% had been treated in the intensive care unit (ICU), 12% had been on ventilators, 3% had kidney replacement therapy and 21% died. The outcomes for people placed on ventilators were grim; 88% of them died. Of the patients who died, people with diabetes were more likely to have been placed on ventilators."
"The most common were hypertension (affecting about 53% of all COVID-19 patients), obesity (affecting about 42% of patients with BMI data) and diabetes (affecting about 32% of all patients)."

Cuomo Says 21% of Those Tested in N.Y.C. Had Virus Antibodies

The preliminary data suggests that many more New Yorkers may have been infected than was previously believed.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/23/nyregion/coronavirus-new-york-update.html?fbclid=IwAR3YJTwrU07fr6OfSNXY1IZwelOaR8fwZEg43IBszJyc70RCnX_6Le38bo0

Higher Mortality Rate in Ventilated COVID-19 Patients in Large Sample

https://ivmmeta.com



Sunlight Inactivates Coronavirus 8 Times Faster Than Predicted. We Need to Know Why

https://www.sciencealert.com/sunlight-inactivates-sars-cov-2-a-lot-faster-than-predicted-and-we-need-to-work-out-why?fbclid=IwAR03Up3R1fkJYGVJu90WW2yvbRApAcl3OlnsZpA1F5NTblX8G84VNC2ZoBw
 

Straight from the CDC

Weekly Updates by Select Demographic and Geographic Characteristics

Provisional Death Counts for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)




Immunological memory to SARS-CoV-2 assessed for greater than six months after infection


Finding that the immune system is retaining immune 'memory' 

 

Understanding immune memory to SARS-CoV-2 is critical for improving diagnostics and vaccines, and for assessing the likely future course of the pandemic. We analyzed multiple compartments of circulating immune memory to SARS-CoV-2 in 185 COVID-19 cases, including 41 cases at > 6 months postinfection. Spike IgG was relatively stable over 6+ months. Spike-specific memory B cells were more abundant at 6 months than at 1 month. SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells declined with a half-life of 3-5 months. By studying antibody, memory B cell, CD4+ T cell, and CD8+ T cell memory to SARS-CoV-2 in an integrated manner, we observed that each component of SARS-CoV-2 immune memory exhibited distinct kinetics.




Physical inactivity is associated with a higher risk for severe COVID-19 outcomes: a study in 48 440 adult patients
 FREE
https://bjsm.bmj.com/content/early/2021/04/07/bjsports-2021-104080

Results Patients with COVID-19 who were consistently inactive had a greater risk of hospitalisation (OR 2.26; 95% CI 1.81 to 2.83), admission to the ICU (OR 1.73; 95% CI 1.18 to 2.55) and death (OR 2.49; 95% CI 1.33 to 4.67) due to COVID-19 than patients who were consistently meeting physical activity guidelines. Patients who were consistently inactive also had a greater risk of hospitalisation (OR 1.20; 95% CI 1.10 to 1.32), admission to the ICU (OR 1.10; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.29) and death (OR 1.32; 95% CI 1.09 to 1.60) due to COVID-19 than patients who were doing some physical activity.






 2008 Feb;82(4):1899-907. Epub 2007 Dec 12.

Difference in receptor usage between severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus and SARS-like coronavirus of bat origin.



In this study, we investigated the receptor usage of the SL-CoV S by combining a human immunodeficiency virus-based pseudovirus system with cell lines expressing the ACE2 molecules of human, civet, or horseshoe bat. In addition to full-length S of SL-CoV and SARS-CoV, a series of S chimeras was constructed by inserting different sequences of the SARS-CoV S into the SL-CoV S backbone. Several important observations were made from this study. First, the SL-CoV S was unable to use any of the three ACE2 molecules as its receptor. Second, the SARS-CoV S failed to enter cells expressing the bat ACE2. Third, the chimeric S covering the previously defined receptor-binding domain gained its ability to enter cells via human ACE2, albeit with different efficiencies for different constructs. Fourth, a minimal insert region (amino acids 310 to 518) was found to be sufficient to convert the SL-CoV S from non-ACE2 binding to human ACE2 binding, indicating that the SL-CoV S is largely compatible with SARS-CoV S protein both in structure and in function. 





https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/apr/28/coronavirus-hype-biggest-political-hoax-in-history/?utm_campaign=shareaholic&utm_medium=facebook&utm_source=socialnetwork&fbclid=IwAR04O_7PsvBnx0OJcZWXcThaDBl-Oni3qzwVKP4I8iGSBzfs9ThLOKf2Yv0


1 in 5 people tested in New York City had antibodies for the coronavirus



" 3,000 samples from 40 locations in 19 counties across the state so far. In New York City, around 21% of randomly sampled people had antibodies against the coronavirus; on Long Island, about 16.7% had antibodies; in Westchester and Rockland around 11.7% had antibodies; and in the rest of the state 3.6% had antibodies, Cuomo said."

"If the actual infection rate among the entire population is similar to the early sample infection rate they found of 13.9%, it would change the death rate of the state, Cuomo said. New York is reporting 15,500 COVID-19 deaths, and if 2.7 million people were infected, that would mean the death rate would be 0.5%, Cuomo said."


A fiasco in the making? As the coronavirus pandemic takes hold, we are making decisions without reliable data

"However, even some so-called mild or common-cold-type coronaviruses that have been known for decades can have case fatality rates as high as 8% when they infect elderly people in nursing homes. In fact, such “mild” coronaviruses infect tens of millions of people every year, and account for 3% to 11% of those hospitalized in the U.S. with lower respiratory infections each winter."


Even deaths that are recorded due to "flu" or 'Corona' .. doesn't necessarily mean it was actually bc of that virus.  A factor? Yes. But if it was the ONLY factor-- everyone would die from it! That's why you hear of other complicating factors that typically correlate with those who have more severe complications or issues or result in death.
"In an autopsy series that tested for respiratory viruses in specimens from 57 elderly persons who died during the 2016 to 2017 influenza season, influenza viruses were detected in 18% of the specimens, while any kind of respiratory virus was found in 47%. In some people who die from viral respiratory pathogens, more than one virus is found upon autopsy and bacteria are often superimposed. A positive test for coronavirus does not mean necessarily that this virus is always primarily responsible for a patient’s demise."



SARS-CoV-2: fear versus data

"Coronaviridae represent a very important family of animal and human viruses [1,2] that are in permanent circulation. Four common human coronaviruses (HKU1, NL63, OC43 and E229) cause 10–20%  of  respiratory  infections  worldwide  and  are  present in all  continents [3–14] "

"In fact, mortality from respiratory  infections  is  extremely  dependent  on  the  quality  of  care  and  access  to  care,  and severe forms have a better prognosis in countries with superior medical infrastructures. Under these conditions, there does not seem to be a significant difference between the mortality rate of SARS-CoV-2 in OECD countries and that of common coronaviruses (χ2 test, P=0.11). Of course, the major flaw in this study is that the percentage of deaths attributable to the virus is not  determined,  but  this  is  the  case  for  all  studies  reporting  respiratory  virus  infections, including SARS-CoV-2. Indeed, viral infections are ecosystem infections where the outcome depends on the inoculums and the surrounding microbiota [26]."
" Thus, certain bacteria seem to be   associated   with   symptomatic   manifestations,   such   as Streptococcus   pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Staphylococcus aureus, which are known to cause an excess of mortality  due  to  secondary  infection. "

"Finally,  in OECD countries, SARS-CoV-2 does  not  seem  to be  deadlier than other circulating  viruses.  In  addition  to coronaviruses,  there  are 16 endemic  viruses in common circulation in  developed  countries  (adenovirus,  bocavirus,  cytomegalovirus,  enterovirus, influenza A H1N1 virus, influenza  A  H3N2 virus, influenza  B virus, metapneumovirus, parainfluenzae virus 1, parainfluenzae virus 2, parainfluenzae virus 3, parainfluenzae virus 4, parechovirus, picornavirus, rhinovirus, syncytial  respiratory  virus), and  2.6  million  deaths from respiratory  infections (excluding tuberculosis) per  year  have  been  noted in recent  years worldwide [27]. There  is  little chance that the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 could change this statistic significantly. Fear  could  have  a  larger  impact than  the  virus  itself; a  case  of  suicide motivated by the fear of SARS-COV-2 has been reported in India [28].  In addition, coronaviruses that have rarely been tested systematically around the world may  persist  in  the  pharynx  of  asymptomatic  people, representing a  potential source  of population  immunity [29].  Furthermore,  it  should  be  noted  that  systematic  studies of other coronaviruses (but not yet for SARS-CoV-2) have found that the percentage of asymptomatic carriers is equal to or even higher than the percentage of symptomatic patients. The same data for SARS-CoV-2 may soon be available, which will further reduce the relative risk associated with this specific pathology"

https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S0924857920300972?token=BDE03DAD07E879102789D12D8626105C74150EB4CD9F39935E9BF38091FA88ACE8E4FCBF2AD356A0B95C2C3566F008F2


Is the Media Engaging in Psychological Warfare Against America?




State-by-state breakdown of federal aid per COVID-19 case

https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/finance/state-by-state-breakdown-of-federal-aid-per-covid-19-case.html?fbclid=IwAR3CtU5ZmK5rutRC2Kksp8zDEcC0E00ClDISN0f2yGKUpt23ZPmtBvI5e7w


Im with this guy:;
Founder of Lifetime Fitness
https://www.cnbc.com/video/2020/04/22/life-time-ceo-bahram-akradi-we-are-ready-to-reopen-safely.html


Expert Testimony Before Senate Contradicts Media’s COVID-19 Narrative






Is Our Fight Against Coronavirus Worse Than the Disease?

There may be more targeted ways to beat the pandemic.
By David L. Katz
Dr. Katz is president of True Health Initiative and the founding director of the Yale-Griffin Prevention Research Center.




Covid-19 — Navigating the Uncharted

List of authors.


https://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/early-antibody-testing-indicates-far-more-covid-19-cases-lower-mortality-rate/2349275/?amp&fbclid=IwAR3wwkbJLASge2wOjzqS1fHC5AHuoKX43F7JUOMXH8NgtA_mQNVRLqXZTI0

Feds classifying all coronavirus patient deaths as ‘COVID-19’ deaths, regardless of cause



"The federal government is classifying the deaths of patients infected with the coronavirus as COVID-19 deaths, regardless of any underlying health issues that could have contributed to the loss of someone’s life."

Covid-19 — Navigating the Uncharted

List of authors.
  • Anthony S. Fauci, M.D., 
  • H. Clifford Lane, M.D., 
  • and Robert R. Redfield, M.D.
    • "
    • The median age of the patients was 59 years, with higher morbidity and mortality among the elderly and among those with coexisting conditions (similar to the situation with influenza); 56% of the patients were male. Of note, there were no cases in children younger than 15 years of age.'
      "
    On the basis of a case definition requiring a diagnosis of pneumonia, the currently reported case fatality rate is approximately 2%.4 In another article in the Journal, Guan et al.5 report mortality of 1.4% among 1099 patients with laboratory-confirmed Covid-19; these patients had a wide spectrum of disease severity. If one assumes that the number of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic cases is several times as high as the number of reported cases, the case fatality rate may be considerably less than 1%. This suggests that the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza (which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1%) or a pandemic influenza (similar to those in 1957 and 1968) rather than a disease similar to SARS or MERS, which have had case fatality rates of 9 to 10% and 36%, respectively.2'
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe2002387


Losing Life and Livelihood: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Unemployment and All-Cause Mortality


More people will die from unemployment alone than from COVID-19.
According to one meta-analysis published in 2011. Unemployment increases mortality rate by 63%.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3070776/…
In March the jobless rate rose 0.9%, the largest single-month change since January 1975, to 4.4%. The pandemic shutdowns started in late March, so April will give a more accurate picture of their impact on the jobs market. JP Morgan is predicting unemployment could reach 20%.
https://www.theguardian.com/…/us-unemployment-americans-job…
With these types of rises of unemployment from 4.4% in March 2020 to potentially 20% we have much more to be concerned about than COVID-19.
A rise from 4.4% to 20% could result in approximately 616,000 deaths due to unemployment and economic factors.
According to one Yale researcher, “Employment is the essential element of social status and it establishes a person as a contributing member of society and also has very important implications for self-esteem,” said Brenner. “When that is taken away, people become susceptible to depression, cardiovascular disease, AIDS and many other illnesses that increase mortality.”
https://news.yale.edu/…/rising-unemployment-causes-higher-d…


Has the Evidence of Asymptomatic Spread of COVID-19 been Significantly Overstated?



How do children spread the coronavirus? The science still isn’t clear



State Department cables warned of safety issues at Wuhan lab studying bat coronaviruses


"There are similar concerns about the nearby Wuhan Center for Disease Control and Prevention lab, which operates at biosecurity level 2, a level significantly less secure than the level-4 standard claimed by the Wuhan Insititute of Virology lab, Xiao said. That’s important because the Chinese government still refuses to answer basic questions about the origin of the novel coronavirus while suppressing any attempts to examine whether either lab was involved."


"The Chinese government, meanwhile, has put a total lockdown on information related to the virus origins. Beijing has yet to provide U.S. experts with samples of the novel coronavirus collected from the earliest cases. The Shanghai lab that published the novel coronavirus genome on Jan. 11 was quickly shut down by authorities for “rectification.” Several of the doctors and journalists who reported on the spread early on have disappeared."



Original research 

Discovery of a rich gene pool of bat SARS-related coronaviruses provides new insights into the origin of SARS coronavirus


How China’s “Bat Woman” Hunted Down Viruses from SARS to the New Coronavirus

Wuhan-based virologist Shi Zhengli has identified dozens of deadly SARS-like viruses in bat caves, and she warns there are more out there



Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China





Whistleblowing coronavirus doctor at Wuhan hospital mysteriously vanishes







Pat Fidopiastis
March 22 at 5:10 PM
As anxiety levels rise due to COVID19 I just wanted to provide some essential context for some of the more alarming information being put out by officials. I have a Ph.D. in microbiology; I teach advanced courses in virus replication and pathogenesis, so if any of my opinions or facts offend you, spare me your Google Searches, you’re not telling me anything I don’t know. We’re in this together now and we must all see it through. But, we don’t need to endure it with any more added stress from the news headlines than is necessary to achieve the end goal. The situation is fluid, so some data and opinions might change going forward.
“COVID19 is 10X deadlier than the flu”.
There is nowhere near enough data to make this claim. Thus, reported case fatality rates are basically just a guess. Patients that have been tested for COVID19 are disproportionately the sickest patients because so far our limited testing capacity is reserved for them. Also, the COVID19 dataset is much smaller than the influenza dataset; bias is far greater in the much smaller COVID19 data set, especially when the calculations are swayed by numbers taken from groups of disproportionally older people stuck on cruise ships. Thus, I’ll bet my Ph.D. that fatality rates will drop dramatically as the overwhelming majority of mild cases are added to the COVID19 data set. Furthermore, COVID19 and flu viruses both have RNA genomes, however COVID19’s genome is non-segmented, while flu viruses have segmented genomes. The advantage of a segmented genome is that if multiple different flu viruses infect the same cell, they can swap genome pieces and create progeny with incredible variation. This is why our seasonal flu vaccines are usually not a good match to the types of flu viruses that are circulating, and why we are dogged by resistance to our flu drugs. It is also why my colleagues and I live in constant fear that a new variant of the flu will emerge that’s even deadlier than the 1918 strain. In contrast, COVID19 has remained relatively genetically stable and therefore should be an excellent vaccine and drug target, and it will be unlikely to surprise us with huge changes in its infection patterns.
“COVID19 spreads more easily than the flu”
There is not enough data to make this claim. The R0 (i.e. number of people each infected person will infect) reported for COVID19 ranges from 1.4 to 3.9 depending on which of the several published papers on the subject you rely on. Meanwhile the R0 for the 2009 H1N1 flu is about 1.5 and seasonal flu varies from 0.9 to 2.1. So, there is enough overlap in published R0 values to wonder which virus actually spreads easier. COVID19 appears to have entered our population back in mid-January when a traveler from Wuhan flew to Washington. As COVID19 spread freely during that time (prior to quarantines), it would have disproportionally struck down the most vulnerable first. Subsequently, human behaviors and fewer susceptible hosts would slow the spread. The dire models simply assume a constant rate of virus encountering highly susceptible hosts, which is never the case. The rate of COVID19 spread in Italy is truly staggering, but for context, there were well over 400,000 new cases of flu in Italy in a single week in January 2020. As of this writing, even though COVID19 was freely circulating for two months without any response, the United States has just about 28,000 identified COVID19 cases and about 400 deaths. There will no doubt be more cases and deaths. However, by comparison, in just the US alone, there were about 300,000 new flu cases per day, and 200 flu-related deaths per day, since October 2019. Not surprisingly, the need to stockpile ventilators for severe flu cases is an annual problem in the US; it’s not just an issue associated with COVID19. The fear of medical rationing during this COVID19 outbreak was the motivation for the “flatten the curve” mantra, in which doctors hoped to spread out patient loads to conserve resources. This fear continues to motivate the increasingly difficult restrictions we are facing.
“This situation is unprecedented.”
Our reaction to COVID19 is unprecedented for sure. However, the outbreak scenario is not unprecedented. Despite President Obama and the CDC’s efforts, the 2009 H1N1 swine flu infected roughly 60 million US citizens, resulting in about 274,000 serious hospitalizations (the high-end estimate is over 400,000 in the US), hundreds of pediatric deaths in the US, and at least 13,000 total US deaths (the high-end CDC estimate is over 18,000 deaths in the US). As that pandemic burned through the world, does anyone remember the level of fear and anxiety that we’re experiencing now? Clearly, we did not learn anything about pandemic preparedness because there have been between 140,000-800,000 hospitalizations and between 20,000 to 80,000 flu deaths each year in the US since 2009. Based on this year’s flu data, the US had roughly 300,000 new infections per day, and around 200 deaths per day since October 2019. The number of COVID19 deaths in Italy is frightening, but for context, a published paper on flu-related deaths in Italy revealed that between 2013 and 2017 there were a total of 68,000 deaths, with an average of 17,000 flu-related deaths per year in that time frame. We have a flu vaccine and oseltamivir, yet the WHO estimates there are about 500,000 flu deaths world-wide each year. Apparently, we’ve just decided to accept those numbers year after year. Amazingly, the staggering toll that the flu takes on us each year isn’t enough to motivate us to significantly increase funding for vaccine research, purchase more ventilators, or add more hospital beds; it took something “novel” to instill the level of fear that might motivate these improvements going forward.
COVID19 is “novel”
This is true. It’s clear from the COVID19 genome sequence that this is indeed a virus that only recently made the jump from an animal host to humans. However, related “mild” coronaviruses infect millions world-wide every year, with significant death rates among the elderly, and comprise a significant proportion (up to 11%) of lower respiratory hospitalizations in the US each year. So, while COVID19 is novel, as a group, coronaviruses are not novel.
“COVID19 remains viable in aerosols and surfaces for hours to days”
There is now published data to support specific claims about how long COVID19 remains viable on surfaces. However, there is a difference between “viability” and ability to cause disease in humans. First, it is important to note that details of the environment matter. To simply say that “COVID19 is viable on surfaces for days” oversimplifies the data. For example, small increases in temperature and humidity seem to dramatically interfere with COVID19 viability on surfaces. In order to conduct these experiments, researchers spray huge numbers of viruses onto a surface under defined environmental conditions, remove samples at regular intervals, and then attempt to resuscitate the viruses under ideal conditions in lab culture. In an actual outbreak scenario, in order for a virus sneezed onto a surface to infect a person, it would not only have to endure the environmental stress, but the potentially weakened (albeit viable) virus would then have to endure the various human immune system defenses in order to cause infection. COVID19 has a flimsy outer coating that is highly vulnerable to damage due to environmental stress. This means that just because a virus on a surface can be resuscitated under ideal conditions in a lab does not mean it is able to cause disease in humans. As with death rates, and other information being disseminated by officials, you’re getting worst case scenarios in order to encourage everyone to stick to the plan. However, even knowing that this is a worst-case scenario, properly wiping down surfaces with a disinfectant and practicing good hygiene should be something we do all the time, not just when we’re frightened during a pandemic.
“COVID19 can spread while you are asymptomatic”
This appears to be true and can complicate efforts to control the spread of COVID19. However, asymptomatic spread is true of many pathogens, which is why we should always be mindful of basic levels of hygiene, not just during a pandemic. For example, my students and I sampled college students for a highly communicable pathogen with a death rate of about 20%, responsible for at least 15,000 deaths annually and billions of dollars in added healthcare costs in the US. We detected asymptomatic carriage in 24% of the healthy population, and the strains were resistant to some of the strongest antibiotics we have. How many of us showing the worst side of humanity by overrunning grocery stores and hoarding food and supplies because of a theoretical COVID19 infection knows whether you’re an asymptomatic carrier of the killer we detected in so many healthy young people? Again, basic hygiene at all times and not just during pandemics is our best weapon.
“Nearly 40% of hospitalized COVID19 patients are aged 20-54”
This statistic is based on a cohort of 508 hospitalized patients, in which 38% (about 200) fell into the 20-54 age range. The vast majority (or likely all) of these individuals will recover but because they require resources, this is still a significant statistic. This information is being emphasized probably in response to images of college-aged Spring Breakers openly flouting the latest quarantine orders. The point is that there is still risk, even if you are younger. However, for context, nearly 500 children died of the flu during the 2018-19 flu season, and there were about 2,500 deaths in the 18-49 age range.
“The virus spreads by aerosols, hand to mouth contact with contaminated saliva, and hand to mouth contact with fecal material”
The virus targets ACE2 receptors, which can be found in the mouth, nose, gut, and lungs, so it has the potential for multiple entry points. Thus, each of these suggested transmission routes is supported. This is a strong reason to rely, first and foremost, on hygiene to inactivate and/or remove viruses on skin and inanimate surfaces to minimize the chances of transmission. Aerosol transmission might be mitigated by practicing “distancing” whenever possible, but this approach is simply not a good long-term solution. Notably, certain human behaviors, such as smoking or vaping, can damage the immune response in the lungs and increase the chance of a more serious COVID19 infection. Thus, countries like China with risk factors such as an aging population, cities with unhealthy air quality, and enormous numbers of smokers, are far more likely to have worse outcomes in this COVID19 pandemic.
“The pandemic will last 18 months or longer”
This is possible, but I doubt it. The dire mathematical models that are driving our response to the virus are based on extreme worst-case scenarios in order to force compliance and hopefully end this pandemic as quickly as possible. Still, rather than fret over worst-case models, it is more useful from a “sanity” perspective to look at outcomes in countries that are more like the United States. The first COVID19 case was confirmed in S. Korea on Jan 20, and as of this writing, the number of new cases slowed from nearly 1000 at its peak to about 70. Importantly, according to a recent news report,“S. Korea is experiencing these dramatic drops without locking down entire cities or taking some of the other authoritarian measures used by China to bring down its number of cases.” Apparently, the key to S. Korea’s positive outcome has been expanded testing to quickly identify new cases. To counter balance the dire predictions about the disease, there are equally dire predictions about the long-term effects of quarantines. Here’s a sample of some of the recent headlines: “Domestic violence calls increase as people shelter in place during COVID-19 outbreak”. “Job losses could quickly soar into the millions as coronavirus craters U.S. economy.” “Gun sales surge as coronavirus pandemic spreads.” “Covid-19 positive patient jumps to death in Delhi”. “The threat of quarantine looming over sick workers and school closures threatening food access and child-care shortfalls”, “The lack of paid sick leave for tens of millions of workers could be catastrophic for low-income families“, “The Economic Impact Of COVID-19 Will Hit Minorities The Hardest”. Another thing that fear will do is drive more people to go to the hospital with even the slightest symptoms, which the vast majority would not do during a normal flu season. This not only increases the spread of the virus, it will overrun hospitals, just as it drove people to selfishly wipe out supplies at stores.
The question that we have to ask ourselves is how did we get to a place where epidemic preparedness is an after-thought, yet there’s always money for massive increases in military spending? Why is it that public health officials are contacting me and my colleagues for molecular biology supplies to conduct COVID19 testing, and asking us to step in as volunteers in the event that case-loads get overwhelming? It is a constant struggle to get average citizens to stay focused on outbreak preparedness beyond each sensational news cycle. Who even thinks about Zika virus anymore? What do all of us need to do every day, not just during a pandemic, to limit the frequency of severity of disease spread? Why was it so hard for the wealthiest country in the world to rapidly mobilize our resources to develop test kits to quickly identify and quarantine people infected with the disease? I taught my 9 and 12-year old children to conduct PCR-based COVID19 testing, so it’s not an issue of technical difficulties, it’s just a matter of properly funding the problem in order to scale up resources. Decision makers in our government deemed this preparedness approach too expensive; they are all quickly learning that the costs of our current unsustainable response will be devastating. In the end, our lack of preparedness has resulted in decision-making based on limited data, painting a picture of extreme worst-case scenarios. In turn, once we move past COVID19, we’ll no doubt end up dealing with the fallout from decisions that were just as bad as the problem we were trying to solve.

Look up Dr Levitt-- epidemiologist





1st documentary movie on the origin of CCP virus, Tracking Down the Origin of the Wuhan Coronavirus





Potential False-Positive Rate Among the 'Asymptomatic Infected Individuals' in Close Contacts of COVID-19 Patients


"Results: When the infection rate of the close contacts and the sensitivity and specificity of reported results were taken as the point estimates, the positive predictive value of the active screening was only 19.67%, in contrast, the false-positive rate of positive results was 80.33%. The multivariate-probabilistic sensitivity analysis results supported the base-case findings, with a 75% probability for the false-positive rate of positive results over 47%"

"Conclusions: In the close contacts of COVID-19 patients, nearly half or even more of the 'asymptomatic infected individuals' reported in the active nucleic acid test screening might be false positives."

Pandemic Surge Models in the Time of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2: Wrong or Useful? FREE





Tucker: What is the actual death rate of COVID-19?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6NjCitwKJSQ&list=PLwchVG6uHkwI9tcEKhkbwoN6CbJT7o0ng&index=6




New coronavirus not the real killer: it's the patient's immune system damaging vital organ
https://www.euronews.com/2020/04/09/understanding-covid-19-the-unknown-disease-with-multiple-faces?fbclid=IwAR11MFfuMsv1FgqSOkFs9LQT146DJzClMuv4lIkOdC7cmTOUZCTmo5oT4_o


85 COVID Patients at The Center for Holistic Medicine: Zero Hospitalizations and No Deaths

https://www.drbrownstein.com/85-chm-covid-patients:-zero-hospitalizations-and-no-deaths/?fbclid=iwar1xnu_nz00bkkvjcxoo0vftw44_xguubsx9bn5evaxzelreowluueuzzpi

"Covi-Pass"

Shit is getting weird. 
https://www.covipass.com/?fbclid=IwAR3xdxzW0d2DWIpouh2AyqlO4jiDBM8bvpiayFixSUZzwwORHeRbee-PKns
Social Distancing 
Only Viruses to be spread due to close contact: (Dr. Dolores Cahill) 
  1. TB
  2. Smallpox 
  3. Ebola 



No coronavirus catastrophes following reopenings of Georgia, Florida and Texas


 https://nypost.com/2020/05/22/no-coronavirus-catastrophes-after-three-southern-states-re-open/?fbclid=IwAR1mdTeuxgfbf5deL-vU9knKpnBnGXGQLUMPX4StAulxBfy-rONq-gX1P5g
Thinking a mask will save you is like thinking a 'filter' on a cigarette will prevent lung cancer. 


Connecting the Dots: Glyphosate and COVID-19
https://www.jennifermargulis.net/glyphosate-and-covid-19-connection/

Are glyphosate and COVID-19 connected? Glyphosate, one of the most toxic chemicals in the world, may be the key to why some people get severely ill from COVID-19. An MIT senior research scientist reports:

By Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D.

The truth about face masks and the coronavirus: Wearing masks in crowded places may help reduce the spread, but it isn't a perfect solution



The truth is that gold-standard scientific studies about face masks — randomized controlled trials — are in short supply.

The Use of Masks and Respirators to Prevent Transmission of Influenza: A Systematic Review of the Scientific Evidence


 2020 Mar 13. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12381. [Epub ahead of print]

Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks against influenza: A systematic review and meta-analysis


CONCLUSION:
"The use of N95 respirators compared with surgical masks is not associated with a lower risk of laboratory-confirmed influenza. It suggests that N95 respirators should not be recommended for general public and nonhigh-risk medical staff those are not in close contact with influenza patients or suspected patients."

WHO says there is no need for healthy people to wear face masks, days after the CDC told all Americans to cover their faces

Effectiveness of Surgical and Cotton Masks in Blocking SARS–CoV-2: A Controlled Comparison in 4 Patients 




A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers


Conclusions

This study is the first RCT of cloth masks, and the results caution against the use of cloth masks. This is an important finding to inform occupational health and safety. Moisture retention, reuse of cloth masks and poor filtration may result in increased risk of infection. Further research is needed to inform the widespread use of cloth masks globally. 

"The use of cloth masks is widespread around the world, particularly in countries at high-risk for emerging infections, but there have been no efficacy studies to underpin their use."

 Sequential CQ / HCQ Research Papers and Reports

January to April 20, 2020

Executive Summary Interpretation of the Data In This Report
The HCQ-AZ combination, when started immediately after diagnosis, appears to be a safe and efficient treatment for COVID-19, with a mortality rate of 0.5%, in elderly patients. It avoids worsening and clears virus persistence and contagious infectivity in most cases.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1545C_dJWMIAgqeLEsfo2U8Kq5WprDuARXrJl6N1aDjY/preview?pru=AAABcewU92A*mzspQchbZCUjDKYsWjU6Kw


March 4, 2020

Medical Masks

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2762694?fbclid=IwAR0rrNSBgrvPJ3h9X5coPUOMSKhaZUvpI33e-ADmWjSMq1NlOrcMRjF65HM
Image description not available.
When Should a Mask Be Used?

Face masks should be used only by individuals who have symptoms of respiratory infection such as coughing, sneezing, or, in some cases, fever. Face masks should also be worn by health care workers, by individuals who are taking care of or are in close contact with people who have respiratory infections, or otherwise as directed by a doctor. Face masks should not be worn by healthy individuals to protect themselves from acquiring respiratory infection because there is no evidence to suggest that face masks worn by healthy individuals are effective in preventing people from becoming ill. Face masks should be reserved for those who need them because masks can be in short supply during periods of widespread respiratory infection. Because N95 respirators require special fit testing, they are not recommended for use by the general public.

Compilation of Research
From Dr. Brett Jones

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DCEjDgnEqW4GMBYUshXWgR_lO6H583iOYYFJjyCaytU/edit?fbclid=IwAR3NaYtn1NF5oJ0OomBDkO4Tj_9hM5T5eN1vvLxirRNO-S27aju7jKcONgc

Ever wonder why no one has given a clear, concise explanation to why masks (specifically cloth “face coverings”) are now recommended and even required in many places like Costco starting Monday?!?
Because there is NO science and logical explanation to justify it!
😳 In fact, studies like this one in Vietnam, published in the journal BMJ in 2015, found that for medical professionals treating the flu in Hanoi hospitals, cloth masks appeared to lead to more infections than medical masks. The cloth holds on to moisture, is often reused, and filters poorly compared to medical masks.” 😳 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4420971/…
Hence, the ridiculously weak, nebulous and almost cryptic explanations from the most revered health organizations in the world...
🤦‍♂️ According to the World Health Organization, “Masks are effective ONLY when used in combination with frequent hand-cleaning with alcohol-based hand rub or soap and water.” 🤦‍♂️ https://www.who.int/…/advice-for-…/when-and-how-to-use-masks
🤦‍♂️ In the words of Mayo Clinic, “Can face masks help prevent the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)? Yes, face masks COMBINED WITH other preventive measures, such as frequent hand-washing and social distancing, help slow the spread of the disease.” 🤦‍♂️ https://www.mayoclinic.org/coronavirus-mask/art-20485449
(Just let this sink in for a moment... if something in-and-of-itself were effective at stopping the spread of COVID, it would not require something else to enhance its efficacy)
⚠️ The fact remains that, “There is little information on the efficacy of face masks in filtering respiratory viruses and reducing viral release from an individual with respiratory infections, and most research has focused on influenza.” ⚠️ https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0843-2

The US Surgeon General once warned against wearing face masks for the coronavirus but the CDC now recommends it

https://www.businessinsider.com/americans-dont-need-masks-pence-says-as-demand-increases-2020-2?fbclid=IwAR3L5kYm-YI9OuPumpyTJPxkDVCscHZeaK-bnklG3O3TUo-w1LxOEhszfGw

Covid19 Death Figures “A Substantial Over-Estimate”Bizarre guidelines from health authorities around the world are potentially including thousands of deceased patients who were never even tested




few weeks ago we reported that, according to the Italian Institute of Health (ISS), only 12% of Italy’s reported Covid19 deaths actually listed Covid19 as the cause of death.
Given that 99% of them had at least one serious co-morbidity (and that 80% of them had two such diseases) this raised serious questions as to the reliability of Italy’s reported statistics.
On March 20th the President of Germany’s Robert Koch Institute confirmed that Germany counts any deceased person who was infected with coronavirus as a Covid19 death, whether or not it actually caused death.
In the United States, a briefing note from the CDC’s National Vital Statistics Service read as follows [our emphasis]:

It is important to emphasise that Coronavirus Disease 19, or Covid-19, should be reported for all decedents where the disease caused or is presumed to have caused or contributed to death.

The referenced detailed “guidance” was released April 3rd, and is no better [again, our emphasis]:

In cases where a definite diagnosis of COVID–19 cannot be made, but it is suspected or likely (e.g., the circumstances are compelling within a reasonable degree of certainty), it is acceptable to report COVID–19 on a death certificate as “probable” or “presumed.” In these instances, certifiers should use their best clinical judgement in determining if a COVID–19 infection was likely.


Government agencies all across the UK are doing the same thing.
Northern Ireland’s HSC Public Health Agency is releasing weekly surveillance bulletins on the pandemic, in those reports they define a “Covid19 death” as:

individuals who have died within 28 days of first positive result, whether or not COVID-19 was the cause of death


CDC's guidance for COVID Dx

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvss/coronavirus/Alert-1-Guidance-for-Certifying-COVID-19-Deaths.pdf
 It is important to emphasize that Coronavirus Disease 2019 or COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death. 
Dr. Brett Jones
"𝐏 𝐑 𝐎 𝐓 𝐄 𝐒 𝐓⁣
⁣
: 𝘢 𝘴𝘰𝘭𝘦𝘮𝘯 𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘭𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘧 𝘰𝘱𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘶𝘴𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘵⁣
⁣
On Friday May 1st, I will be in Sacramento, CA protesting the mismanagement and lack of strategy to reopen California by Governor Gavin Newsom. At this point, a shelter in place order for at least healthy populations is unscientific. ⁣
⁣
“UN-scientific?!”⁣
⁣
Yes. This is no longer about saving lives. This about an inability to adapt to current scientific data in fear of being seen as having made the wrong decision. ⁣
⁣
Remember when they estimated SARS-CoV-2 to have a Case Fatality Rate (CFR) of 3-5%?⁣
⁣
It was WRONG.⁣
⁣
At the time, we were only testing people that were hospitalized and experiencing moderate-severe symptoms (which drastically inflates the CFR)⁣
⁣
Now, with the antibody testing (testing people regardless of symptoms) that was performed in Santa Clara County, LA county, New York, and Germany we know the CFR is much closer to 0.1-0.4% (similar to the seasonal flu).⁣
⁣
Remember when they said we needed “stay ay home” to “flatten the curve” so that hospitals don’t get “overwhelmed”?⁣
⁣
Many hospitals around the US are UNDERUTILIZED and have laid off an unprecedented 43,000 people during the coronavirus pandemic.⁣
⁣
Remember when we issued a quarantine as a way to protect the sick and vulnerable?⁣
⁣
Yes, in the beginning, we didn’t know who the vulnerable were…. Now, we know certain age populations and people with co-morbidities are at least 90% more likely to have moderate-severe responses to Covid-19.⁣"


How do children spread the coronavirus? The science still isn’t clear

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-01354-0

BIG LEAGUE WELLNESS

Dr. Anthony Fauci Plotted ‘Global Vaccine Action Plan’ with Bill Gates Before Pushing COVID Panic and Doubts About Hydroxychloroquine Treatments


https://web.archive.org/web/20200409082732/https://bigleaguepolitics.com/dr-anthony-fauci-plotted-global-vaccine-action-plan-with-bill-gates-before-pushing-covid-panic-and-doubts-about-hydroxychloroquine-treatments/

Hydroxychloroquine rated ‘most effective’ coronavirus treatment, poll of doctors finds


Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1232869/?fbclid=IwAR1EccrUltZEMLljtrGXIV_ylna7YrIJOBTe5KuBEwz_P5i-EfSNsuoDg-o

The Event 201 scenario

Bill Gates and the return on investment in vaccinations

https://www.cnbc.com/video/2019/01/23/bill-gates-and-the-return-on-investment-in-vaccinations-davos.html?fbclid=IwAR1k_IEJGvvhy-zLEeNj4OdFhqgyZUwQ6CElY2ZOp8b-Ur4dvb1-Pygp4nU
Bill Gates Laying Foundation for Mark of the Beast

 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NyvVfQNfXtZDP0ZgVYw6Mw5X_B6pdK-gXFyd9g1zJgA/mobilebasic?fbclid=IwAR1rycrhn4XG4T4ZlnXMrpUHHvJ-ns0gKu07QgBwehB5b_waCn1oRvk3yOk
Bill Gates is Setting the Stage for the Mark of the Beast
Scott Keisler - April 20, 2020
In 2016 a powerful confab of globalists converged at the UN headquarters in New York, New York to launch a global initiative called ID2020. The vision of ID2020 is ostensibly to advocate "for ethical, privacy-protecting approaches to digital ID"(1) and to provide IDs for "over 1 billion people worldwide (who) do not have access to any form of identification."(2)
The Rockefeller Foundation provided the seed money for the ambitious ID project and continues to be an ongoing supporter of ID2020’s work.(3) The project's other founding members include Gavi The Vaccine Alliance, Microsoft, Accenture and IDEO.org.(4) The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation gave $750 million to set up the aforementioned Gavi in 1999 and "the (Gates) Foundation is a key Gavi partner in vaccine market shaping."(5) Thus between Microsoft and The Gates Foundation ID2020 has been operating under the guiding hand of Bill Gates from the onset.
ID2020 seeks "to leverage immunization as an opportunity to establish digital identity"(6) and to "provide a unique digital identity to everyone on the planet."(7) Of course all this will be done, we are told, with the utmost respect for personal privacy, security and choice.(8) After all, "Participation in the modern economy, the ability to buy and sell, attain employment, healthcare, social services and more are virtually impossible without a digital identity."(9)(emphasis added)
So basically Bill Gates has adopted as his personal mission the task of enrolling every single person on the planet in a global ID database. And vaccines are the vehicle through which this will be accomplished.
Last week Robert F. Kenned, Jr. penned a scathing article exposing Bill Gates for what he really is,
"Vaccines, for Bill Gates, are a strategic philanthropy that feed his many vaccine-related businesses (including Microsoft’s ambition to control a global vaccination ID enterprise) and give him dictatorial control of global health policy."(10)
Kennedy continues,
"In 2010, when Gates committed $10 billion to the WHO, he said 'We must make this the decade of vaccines.'"(11)
And,
"In addition to using his philanthropy to control WHO, UNICEF, GAVI, and PATH, Gates funds a private pharmaceutical company that manufactures vaccines and is donating $50 million to 12 pharmaceutical companies to speed up development of a coronavirus vaccine."(12)
If you aren't familiar with the atrocities that have been committed around the globe by Bill Gates in the name of vaccination and population control Kennedy gives a concise overview here.
Some readers may not know that Bill Gates' father was on the Board of Planned Parenthood(13), the abortion provider that was founded on racist principles and eugenics. For the Gateses culling the earth of useless eaters is a generational enterprise. (See Gates endorsing Death Panels here.)
On March 19, 2020 Bill Gates took to Reddit to propose a digital certificate to identify those who have received the Covid19 vaccination.(14) Vaccination recipients, according to Gates, can be given a "quantum dot tattoo"(15), which is "a bit of dye that is invisible to the naked eye" but that can be seen with infrared light.(16) The tattoo would store a digital file that could be read with a scanner or a smartphone.(17) This quantum dot tattoo was developed at MIT and funded by...guess who?(18)
It doesn't take too much imagination to see the convergence of a mandatory vaccination and a mandatory global digital ID here(19) - a present from the Globalists that would eventually be required to buy and sell in the Brave New post Covid19 World.(19)
On March 26, 2020 Microsoft filed Patent WO/2020/060606 (note that last number) which uses 'body activity' to authorize and verify cryptocurrency transactions.(20) Examples of body activity include "brain wave, pulse rate or body heat radiation".(21)
Cryptocurrency is block-chain oriented and could very well serve as the currency in the coming global cashless society.
It's interesting that the name of the initiative in view is ID2020. Not ID2019, ID2021 or ID2025. It is also curious that Dr. Anthony Fauci of The White House's Coronavirus Task Force said in 2017, almost prophetically, "There is no question that there will be a challenge to the coming administration in the arena of infectious diseases."(22)
It's almost as if this was all planned some time ago.
Fauci "serves as a member of the Leadership Council for the Global Vaccine Action Plan developed by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the World Health Organization, UNICEP and Fauci’s own NIAID — the plan that calls for a 'Decade of Vaccines' to spread far and wide, all around the globe."(23) Bill Gates "has a multi-million dollar relationship with Dr. Fauci."(24) Suffice it to say the connections between Gates and Fauci are extensive (see here). And here is Dr. Fauci very clearly giving the Masonic Hidden Hand gesture at a recent White House press conference for the whole world to see.
Was Fauci making an announcement to 'enlightened' initiates around the world?
Bill Gates with Dr. Anthony Fauci
Also it causes all, both small and great, both rich and poor, both free and slave, to be marked on the right hand or the forehead,
so that no one can buy or sell unless he has the mark, that is, the name of the beast or the number of its name.
This calls for wisdom: let the one who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man, and his number is 666. Revelation 13:16-18
I'm not saying this is the Mark of the Beast but the groundwork and infrastructure are definitely being laid.
     

  1. https://id2020.org/faq
  2. Ibid.
  3. https://id2020.org/alliance
  4. Ibid.
  5. https://www.gavi.org/operating-model/gavis-partnership-model/bill-melinda-gates-foundation
  6. https://www.biometricupdate.com/201909/id2020-and-partners-launch-program-to-provide-digital-id-with-vaccines
  7. https://www.windowscentral.com/microsoft-universal-digital-identification-and-you?amp
  8. https://id2020.org/faq
  9. https://www.windowscentral.com/microsoft-universal-digital-identification-and-you?amp
  10. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/government-corruption/gates-globalist-vaccine-agenda-a-win-win-for-pharma-and-mandatory-vaccination/
  11. Ibid.
  12. Ibid.
  13. https://magazine.washington.edu/feature/the-immense-impact-of-bill-gates-sr/ 
  14. https://amp.reddit.com/r/China_Flu/comments/flja0e/bill_gates_purposes_digital_certificate_of_whos/ 
  15. https://jamesfetzer.org/2020/03/bill-gates-quantum-dot-digital-tattoo-implant-to-track-covid-19-vaccine-compliance/
  16. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/invisible-ink-could-reveal-whether-kids-have-been-vaccinated/
  17. Ibid.
  18. https://jamesfetzer.org/2020/03/bill-gates-quantum-dot-digital-tattoo-implant-to-track-covid-19-vaccine-compliance/
  19. https://banned.video/watch?id=5da4c433392c2e0019afaae6
  20. https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2020060606&tab=PCTBIBLIO
  21. https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2020060606&tab=PCTCLAIMS







Robert F Kennedy Jr. Exposes Bill Gates’ Vaccine Dictatorship Plan


Does the whole pandemic stand to benefit Bill Gates tremendously as he will provide the technology to develop "global immunity passports" and the Gates Foundation will be heavily involved in any vaccine creation?  Is it possible?
#Vaccines, for #BillGates, are a strategic philanthropy that feed his many vaccine-related businesses (including #Microsoft’s ambition to control a global vac ID enterprise) and give him dictatorial control over global health policy—the spear tip of corporate neo-imperialism.
Gates’ obsession with vaccines seems fueled by a messianic conviction that he is ordained to save the world with technology and a god-like willingness to experiment with the lives of lesser humans.
Promising to eradicate Polio with $1.2 billion, Gates took control of India ‘s National Advisory Board (NAB) and mandated 50 polio vaccines (up from 5) to every child before age 5. Indian doctors blame the Gates campaign for a devastating vaccine-strain polio epidemic that paralyzed 496,000 children between 2000 and 2017. In 2017, the Indian Government dialed back Gates’ vaccine regimen and evicted Gates and his cronies from the NAB. Polio paralysis rates dropped precipitously. In 2017, the World Health Organization reluctantly admitted that the global polio explosion is predominantly vaccine strain, meaning it is coming from Gates’ Vaccine Program. The most frightening epidemics in Congo, the Philippines, and Afghanistan are all linked to Gates’ vaccines. By 2018, ¾ of global polio cases were from Gates’ vaccines.
In 2014, the #GatesFoundation funded tests of experimental HPV vaccines, developed by GSK and Merck, on 23,000 young girls in remote Indian provinces. Approximately 1,200 suffered severe side effects, including autoimmune and fertility disorders. Seven died. Indian government investigations charged that Gates funded researchers committed pervasive ethical violations: pressuring vulnerable village girls into the trial, bullying parents, forging consent forms, and refusing medical care to the injured girls. The case is now in the country’s Supreme Court.
In 2010, the Gates Foundation funded a trial of a GSK’s experimental malaria vaccine, killing 151 African infants and causing serious adverse effects including paralysis, seizure, and febrile convulsions to 1,048 of the 5,049 children.
During Gates 2002 MenAfriVac Campaign in Sub-Saharan Africa, Gates operatives forcibly vaccinated thousands of African children against meningitis. Between 50-500 children developed paralysis. South African newspapers complained, “We are guinea pigs for drug makers”
Nelson Mandela’s former Senior Economist, Professor Patrick Bond, describes Gates’ philantropic practices as “ruthless” and “immoral”.
In 2010, Gates committed $10 billion to the WHO promising to reduce population, in part, through new vaccines. A month later Gates told a Ted Talk that new vaccines “could reduce population”. In 2014, Kenya’s Catholic Doctors Association accused the WHO of chemically sterilizing millions of unwilling Kenyan women with a phony “tetanus” vaccine campaign.
Independent labs found the sterility formula in every vaccine tested.
After denying the charges, WHO finally admitted it had been developing the sterility vaccines for over a decade.
Similar accusations came from Tanzania, Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines.
A 2017 study (Morgensen et.Al.2017) showed that WHO’s popular DTP is killing more African than the disease it pretends to prevent. Vaccinated girls suffered 10x the death rate of unvaccinated children.
Gates and the WHO refused to recall the lethal vaccine which WHO forces upon millions of African children annually.
Global public health advocates around the world accuse Gates of – hijacking WHO’s agenda away from the projects that are proven to curb infectious diseases; clean water, hygiene, nutrition and economic development.
They say he has diverted agency resources to serve his personal fetish – that good health only comes in a syringe.
In addition to using his philanthropy to control WHO, UNICEF, GAVI and PATH, Gates funds private pharmaceutical companies that manufacture vaccines, and a massive network of pharmaceutical industry front groups that broadcast deceptive propaganda, develop fraudulent studies, conduct surveillance and psychological operations against vaccine hesitancy and use Gates’ power and money to silence dissent and coerce compliance.
In this recent nonstop Pharmedia appearances, Gates appears gleeful that the Covid-19 crisis will give him the opportunity to force his third-world vaccine programs on American children.”

Even in the MSM:

Bill Gates and his coronavirus conflicts of interest

Polio outbreaks in Africa caused by mutation of strain in vaccine

 This article is more than 5 months old

New cases of highly infectious disease that should be ‘consigned to the history books’ reported in Nigeria, the DRC, CAR and Angola
https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2019/nov/28/polio-outbreaks-in-four-african-countries-caused-by-mutation-of-strain-in-vaccine?fbclid=IwAR3IbOSI79UiVYRqR1uiXWZSiSiwP1xjshE5fwAnFslGBIR0P2tEbxmIMd4




Gates’ Globalist Vaccine Agenda: A Win-Win for Pharma and Mandatory Vaccination


By Robert F. Kennedy Jr
Global Research, April 13, 2020

https://www.globalresearch.ca/gates-globalist-vaccine-agenda-win-win-pharma-mandatory-vaccination/5709493?fbclid=IwAR2hzw_2j42rUcznhnG0WLe3umhZXIeFXopPCqSax8b4PZUeruulGxa-igY


A potential coronavirus vaccine funded by Bill Gates is set to begin testing in people, with the first patient expected to get it today


 The fu*k? 

. 2019 Dec 18;11(523):eaay7162.
 doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aay7162.

Biocompatible Near-Infrared Quantum Dots Delivered to the Skin by Microneedle Patches Record Vaccination

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31852802/?fbclid=IwAR1eomc5o1vRminmDLih0vJcnTLQ1PIShLIphvLsfCOqSm9ziSOmqEv2yrg
 "an approach to encode medical history on a patient using the spatial distribution of biocompatible, near-infrared quantum dots (NIR QDs) in the dermis. QDs are invisible to the naked eye yet detectable when exposed to NIR light."


As Coronavirus Panic Spreads, Bill Gates Talks Up ‘Digital Certificates’ to Enforce Mandatory Vaccines




"The ID2020 Project, an globalist identification project that would force people to submit their personally-identifiable information into an Orwellian database, announced their vaccine-tracking program last year:
The ID2020 Alliance has launched a new digital identity program at its annual summit in New York, in collaboration with the Government of Bangladesh, vaccine alliance Gavi, and new partners in government, academia, and humanitarian relief.
The program to leverage immunization as an opportunity to establish digital identity was unveiled by ID2020 in partnership with the Bangladesh Government’s Access to Information (a2i) Program, the Directorate General of Health Services, and Gavi, according to the announcement…
“Digital ID is being defined and implemented today, and we recognize the importance of swift action to close the identity gap,” comments ID2020 Executive Director Dakota Gruener. “Now is the time for bold commitments to ensure that we respond both quickly and responsibly. We and our ID2020 Alliance partners, both present and future, are committed to rising to this challenge.”
ID2020 also announced new partnerships and provided progress reports on initiatives launched last year. Since last year’s summit, the ID2020 Alliance has been joined by the City of Austin, UC Berkeley’s CITRIS Policy Lab and Care USA."

Gates, who funded a preparedness project that conveniently war gamed for a corona pandemic just months before the real pandemic hit, has frequently warned – or perhaps threatened – that a worldwide plague is coming to kill millions of people.
“In the case of biological threats, that sense of urgency is lacking,” he said. “The world needs to prepare for pandemics in the same serious way it prepares for war.”

Increase in state suicide rates in the USA during economic recession


https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(12)61910-2/fulltext?fbclid=IwAR1Eh8oEiVICQfCt1rjVMtHM2rOocKue2TizBxPVM1MH3H063fsbYaZtdaY



COVID 2019-suicides: A global psychological pandemic


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7177120/

The Event 201 scenario




Sen. Dr. Jensen's Shocking Admission About Coronavirus

 https://www.valleynewslive.com/content/misc/Sen-Dr-Jensens-Shocking-Admission-About-Coronavirus-569458361.html

New Data Suggest the Coronavirus Isn’t as Deadly as We Thought


A study finds 50 to 85 times as many infections as known cases—meaning a far lower fatality rate.


 https://www.wsj.com/articles/new-data-suggest-the-coronavirus-isnt-as-deadly-as-we-thought-11587155298?fbclid=IwAR1tQwUqXlKe9GvWf05FR3oqVdSa9Hox1PC_BVkFTmFFnM-KPvBt_ALnhaQ




The Rockefeller Foundation created the WHO & funds U.S. Public Health
https://libertygalaxy.com/rockefeller-globalism-using-health/?fbclid=IwAR3nlD2qkB5x66TzOXljHMVAKZEV4FWF__NJ0vlBHz89wei0-aY2DZqhvHw






WHO warning: No evidence that antibody tests can show coronavirus immunity


"“What the use of these tests will do will measure the level of antibodies. It’s a response that the body has a week or two later after they’ve been infected with this virus,” she said at a news conference at WHO’s Geneva headquarters. “Right now, we have no evidence that the use of a serological test can show that an individual is immune or protected from reinfection.”


Dr. Mike Ryan, executive director of WHO’s emergencies program, said scientists are also still determining the length of protection antibodies might give a person who has been infected with the coronavirus. 
“Nobody is sure whether someone with antibodies is fully protected against having the disease or being exposed again,” he said.
“Plus some of the tests have issues with sensitivity,” he added. “They may give a false negative result."



Former AIDS Scientist Judy Mikovits PhD EXPOSES Anthony Fauci,Dr Birx & UNCOVERS Medical Corruption



https://youtu.be/QZPrUb0AcKw

Air pollution may be ‘key contributor’ to Covid-19 deaths – study

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/apr/20/air-pollution-may-be-key-contributor-to-covid-19-deaths-study?fbclid=IwAR0fChAAJvgCueaFDp04UhfkuUBMaO3Xb9ufT9m9dhaBLikUEk-vF-4f3O0

"The analysis shows that of the coronavirus deaths across 66 administrative regions in Italy, Spain, France and Germany, 78% of them occurred in just five regions, and these were the most polluted."

 "The research examined levels of nitrogen dioxide, a pollutant produced mostly by diesel vehicles, and weather conditions that can prevent dirty air from dispersing away from a city. Many studies have linked NO2 exposure to health damage, and particularly lung disease, which could make people more likely to die if they contract Covid-19.
“The results indicate that long-term exposure to this pollutant may be one of the most important contributors to fatality caused by the Covid-19 virus in these regions and maybe across the whole world,” said Yaron Ogen, at Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg in Germany, who conducted the research. “Poisoning our environment means poisoning our own body, and when it experiences chronic respiratory stress its ability to defend itself from infections is limited.”"

Assessing nitrogen dioxide (NO2) levels as a contributing factor to coronavirus (COVID-19) fatality


Why coronavirus will not take hold in America as it did in Italy and South Korea

While the trajectory of the epidemic here is still unknown, the U.S. is not Italy, South Korea (or China)

-->We need to be careful who we listen to...  where they're getting their info... the assumptions they're making.. the projections they're using... 

There's a LOT more to the story than going based off of very rough models. 

We can't make DIRECT assumptions based on what other countries have experienced.  

https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/why-coronavirus-will-not-take-hold-in-america-like-it-did-in-italy-and-south-korea?utm_content=bufferad7fb&utm_medium=LSN%2Bbuffer&utm_source=facebook&utm_campaign=LSN&fbclid=IwAR2zcuK2_YMfkVWzM9mEBZNPJ-f52i1waVhkbWYcPAWPLqfDCWS4cY6zRys

Horowitz: WHEN did coronavirus begin in the US? And why it matters


Has Sweden Found the Right Solution to the Coronavirus?


Sweden resisted a lockdown, and its capital Stockholm is expected to reach ‘herd immunity’ in weeks

  • Unlike its neighbors, Sweden did not impose a lockdown amid the coronavirus outbreak.
  • The strategy — aimed at building a broad-base of immunity while protecting at-risk groups like the elderly — has proved controversial.
  • But Sweden’s chief epidemiologist has said “herd immunity” could be reached in Stockholm within weeks.

Lockdowns Do Not Control the Coronavirus: The Evidence

https://www.aier.org/article/lockdowns-do-not-control-the-coronavirus-the-evidence/?fbclid=IwAR24DNKTpLvYFLdNxWuRBQRxpOZT7MMT4eQZGNzCh-SgbWsno2g_CaDIsKc



Deepfakes Are Going To Wreak Havoc On Society. We Are Not Prepared.




Artificial intelligence is able to 'create' people for media purposes. 

Pretty soon--- We won't be able to tell real.. from fake. 

Complete mind-f*ckery



 Symbolism/Numbers 
Google "COVID 322"


And for some background

What is the real meaning behind The Number 322 - to The Illuminati



https://usa-prophecies.blogspot.com/2011/06/skull-and-bones-illuminati-322.html?m=1&fbclid=IwAR2r65OpKqn3ECEYDNqiTdy-nUCiWrJQHJe-DbXCLwyiDia0SsbVs4NkSys

 Search Results

Siouxland News
June 14th: 322 active COVID-19 infections in Dakota County
... 1 new COVID-19 case in Dakota County, Nebraska. Out of the 1,739 confirmed positive cases, 322 are still considered active infections.
1 day ago

WPEC
Palm Beach County leaders grapple with record daily COVID increase, amid recent rise
In Palm Beach County, there was also a record number of 322 new cases Friday, which comes amid an upward trend going back two weeks.
2 days ago

Shepherd Express
322 New COVID-19 Cases Reported in Wisconsin, 12 Deaths
There are currently 315 patients hospitalized with COVID-19. There were 322 new confirmed cases in the last 24 hours (2.7 percent positive). The ...
1 week ago

The Lincolnite
Lockdown Week 13 Day 1: 322 Lincolnshire coronavirus ...
322 COVID-19 deaths in Greater Lincolnshire (no change). 136 at United Lincolnshire Hospitals Trust (no change); 3 at Lincolnshire ...
10 hours ago

1011now
Two course options for Fall 2020 semester at Bryan College of ...
At Bryan Health, to date, 11,326 people have been tested, of those 1,479 people have tested positive for COVID-19, and there are 322 pending ...
3 hours ago

NJ Pen
Camden County: 322 More COVID-19 Cases, 10 More ...
Another 322 Camden County residents tested positive for novel coronavirus (COVID-19) over Memorial Day weekend and 10 others died of ...
3 weeks ago

Khaleej Times
Combating coronavirus: 322 makeshift markets removed in ...
The Sharjah Municipality has removed 322 pop-up shops and confiscated a large quantity of fake masks and sanitisers as well as cosmetics ...
8 hours ago

delawarebusinessnow.com
Coronavirus deaths rise to 322 as new cases drop below 150 ...
A total of 322 Delawareans have died due to complications from COVID-19. Individuals who have died from COVID-19 ranged in age from 21 to ...
3 weeks ago

Personal Injury Bureau UK
Coronavirus (COVID-19) Business Impact – Triflusal (CAS 322-79-2) Market Industry Analysis, Trend and Growth, 2019-2029
Coronavirus (COVID-19) Business Impact – Triflusal (CAS 322-79-2) Market Industry Analysis, Trend and Growth, 2019-2029. Posted on 14th ...
1 day ago

Khaleej Times
Combating coronavirus: Sharjah Municipality removes 322 ...
Combating coronavirus: Sharjah Municipality removes 322 makeshift markets during Covid-19 pandemic. Afkar Abdullah /Sharjah.
5 hours ago

Stay up to date on results for 322 covid.


Fifty-four scientists have lost their jobs as a result of NIH probe into foreign ties





A fiasco in the making? As the coronavirus pandemic takes hold, we are making decisions without reliable data

99% of those who died from virus had other illness, Italy says

---or 2, or 3.. or more co-morbidities
50% had 3 or more
median age of 80
the possibility of death was looming nearby, regardless of the next virus/stress that would take them out.





Dr. Thomas Cowan Covid19 fails koch's postulates







A Plan to Get America Back to Work

Some experts say it can be done in weeks, not months — and the economy and public health are at stake.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/22/opinion/coronavirus-economy.html?fbclid=IwAR2zBcRFBS4-J4gS99B6Z2I43g4UrgX5KcJLnarzJPFnnffsl1grnDmh1co

The History of Pandemics



What is this really about? 

In the US from Oct 1, 2019 - March 14, 2020...there have been roughly 30,000-60,000 deaths from Influenza...with no government action...and this repeats every year...this isn't about a virus!





University projections of COVID-19 hospitalizations turn out to be four times too high

Stanford epidemiologist warns that coronavirus crackdown is based on bad data



Interesting .. thots

Epidemiologist: Coronavirus could be ‘exterminated’ if lockdowns were lifted

Conversations with Chiropractors 

WTF: Gates Foundation Sponsored Training for ‘Fictional’ Coronavirus Outbreak That Caused 65 Million Deaths Last Year



20200423 Bending the curve total cases

Event 201:



stats from 2019...

💥 840,768 deaths from cardiovascular disease (American college of cardiology)

💥 4.2 million deaths from diabetes in 2019 (international diabetes federation)

💥1.76 million people die from lung cancer (global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease)

💥 100 million Americans have hypertension. 500,000 died in 2017 with hypertension said as primary cause (heart.org)

The REAL sickness is not a virus...

Because If you live a healthy lifestyle your body is able to adapt...

The sickness is your body’s inability to adapt because of your lifestyle.

We need to demand a government that promotes health...

Not continuing to promote sickness




The CDC shared with us who is being hospitalized from Coronavirus.

89.3% had one or more underlying conditions; the most common were hypertension (49.7%), obesity (48.3%), chronic lung disease (34.6%), diabetes mellitus (28.3%), and cardiovascular disease (27.8%)...

These are all lifestyle choice diseases.
No photo description available.

Surgeon General: Coronavirus Less Deadly Than Normal Flu For Children And Young Adults


From Dr. Jockers 

https://drjockers.com/bonus-episode-coronavirus-symptoms-natural-solutions/?fbclid=IwAR1yE-WdLtA4RVYd8yQNfL19SgL_VznO2-deOAYmTqJ8A5QNova8r2WuCA8

Future Air Travel: Four-Hour Process, Self Check-In, Disinfection, Immunity Passes





..

What "they" have managed to pull off.. right under our noses.

Mass deception

Utilized fear and panic to successfully get billions of people to comply

Taking away personal liberties
Bending the constitution

Bailed out the banks.. again-- 60+% of the $2 trillion economy 'boost' went to banks..
--> the $1200/person?  4%.  Cool.

Increased govt control
Increased homeland security

Mass unemployment.. that people are 'understanding of'


Inflammatory terms:

Lockdown::  Jail term
Quarentine:: War term
Shelter-in-place:: Nuclear warfare term

Inflammatory numbers



Why not a 'TARGETED' quarentine?

Why a mass quarantine ?

Has it been effective?




Tucker: How long will the lockdowns last?

Well that's refreshing. A news reporter.. seemingly speaking his mind..



“Fear is the currency of control.”
-David Icke


Dr Zach Bush



Covid-19 had us all fooled, but now we might have finally found its secret.








Dr. Joe Arvay Coronavirus 101 Workshop 5-9-2020






















Connecting the Dots: Glyphosate and COVID-19





Interesting Considerations:::


Pandemic and virus lies: No more fake news - Jon Rappoport since 1988: https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/ Dr Amandha Dawn Vollmer: Coronavirus Tomfoolery - How the Virus Lie is Created https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xNq8w... Dr Amandha Dawn Vollmer: Coronavirus is not a Virus https://www.facebook.com/groups/23446... Torsten Engelbrecht & Dr Claus Koehnlein: Virus Mania. How the Medical Industry Continually Invents Epidemics, Making Billion-Dollar Profits At Our Expense (2007): http://www.whale.to/c/Virus-Mania55tt...

Dismantling the Virus theory
https://wissenschafftplus.de/uploads/article/Dismantling-the-Virus-Theory.pdf?fbclid=IwAR34enC96fP-jAFMAl6qc8EDSNDtFcojN6HLS_JAYo9ZQx_Z6YoPwKidORQ

Experiments to Determine Mode of Spread of Influenza

Rosenau, Milton J.


Tracy Høeg is in Kings Beach, California.

I wanted to give an update on the research regarding COVID in children.

I should back up briefly and state that I am a physician with a PhD in Epidemiology who became very interested in this topic when a colleague and friend of mine, Jennifer Kasten, MD MSc, wrote a systematic review of COVID epidemiology in children (https://www.facebook.com/jenniferkastenmd/posts/128898328763114) and found kids 12 and under *might be viral "dead ends", meaning they can get COVID but can't transmit to anyone else. This really captured my interest because this would make COVID very different from most respiratory viruses we know (although very similar to SARS COV1, which only had one known case of transmission from a child 18 or under https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/551274…). Then in a physician's group dedicated to school opening, a physician researcher published a document for the group in which said she could identify 0 (zero) cases of certain transmission of COVID from children under 12 in the scientific literature and since that time Dr. Rutherford, UCSF Epidemiologist, has also been public about elementary-aged children being a "one way street" for infection - they get it but don't appear to transmit it, much, if at all. (UCSF Grand Rounds lectures are now available on YouTube for those interested in hearing him).

Last month, I did my own summary of the data (https://www.facebook.com/tracy.hoeg/posts/10219217323357158) and found evidence of the following:

*Very limited transmission if any from children ages 12 and under to either other children or adults

*Children appeared to be at least 10 times more likely to die of influenza than Covid and are more likely to be struck by lightning (I rechecked the CDC website today 7/13 and they are still reporting 3 deaths in children under 18 due to confirmed COVID; for comparison, there have been 185 deaths due to influenza in this population in the 2019/2020 season. Edit: see updated mortality data below from the 7/19 addition).

*Countries that reopened elementary schools as a first step in their country's reopening did not see an uptick in cases (these include numerous European and Asian countries, some of which are displayed in Figure 4). Reopenings not causing and uptick in cases is consistent with children not being a major vector for the disease. Figure 3 shows age of the source of the cases of COVID in Holland, with none ages 18 and under in their study, as just an example of these data.

What have we learned in the last month?

1. We now have a generally accepted mechanism for younger children getting milder disease and transmitting significantly less than adults, which is paucity of ACE2 receptors in the respiratory tract compared with adults (this is the receptor SARS COV2 and SARS COV1 use to enter the cells of the body). This could explain why children get COVID (and SARS 1) less, have milder disease (lower viral load) and are less contagious (if contagious at all). Yet another way COVID is unlike typical influenza! https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2766524
(Figure 2)
2. Consistent with this was the study showing lower viral load (lower amount of the virus) in children up to age 18. (Figure 1). The original non-peer reviewed print of this article from Drosten et al was reanalyzed as per UCSF Grand Rounds and does indeed show significantly lower viral load in children as seen in image 1.

3. This is great news for teachers and children, because not only are children significantly less likely to transmit COVID, but IF they do, the dose of the "inoculum" will be expected to be lower and there is mounting evidence (lit review here: https://www.facebook.com/tracy.hoeg/posts/10219560737982309) that the lower the dose of the virus you get, the less severe your disease will be if you even get symptoms at all. This may be why Denmark and Norway were able to reopen elementary schools without any mask wearing in children (or adults for that matter!); however, they also had lower prevalence in the population on their side! Now, in the US if adults and children in school are able to wear masks, this will both lower the risk of transmission (which appears to be very low FROM the 12 and under age group) as well as the severity of the disease.

4. I am sensing many of your are STILL skeptical we can safely open elementary schools in the US. Well, thankfully we have really good data from the YMCA childcare for essential workers in the US, which has been providing childcare throughout the pandemic (our kids go there) and was even open in NYC at the height of the outbreak and they have had 0/>40,000 kids (ages 14 and under) contract COVID. They have also not had any outbreaks, though a few staff at different sites tested positive (presumably contracted from another adult per the above data) and quarantined so no more than 1 positive case a just a limited number of sites. Adults wear masks, kids don't, temperature checks at the door, each kid has a small "cohort" of kids they do everything with. More details can be seen in this article, but it shows that WE CAN DO THIS SAFELY in the US - even in areas hit severely by the virus and with truly minimal resources. https://www.npr.org/…/what-parents-can-learn-from-child-car…

Edit: The small cohorts in children may actually not be necessary and the data I am using to support this is guidelines for return to school in Holland in quotes below and from their Ministry of Health Website (https://www.rivm.nl/…/novel-coronavir…/children-and-covid-19). This model has worked for them:

"Children up to and including 12 years of age do not have to keep 1.5 metres apart from each other and from adults. This also applies to childcare and primary education."

Edit: Though the above has worked in Holland, given the prevalence of the disease in the US and the possibility children can spread the virus (though apparently much less efficiently than adults), it would be best to have children wear a mask, even in this age group, as it could further minimize risk of transmission, with very little downside, even if compliance is not 100%.

--I also want to briefly address the many "clickbaity" articles in the popular press lately about school and day care outbreaks. Specifically I will mention the school outbreaks in Israel where there were some infections in high school aged children but the "outbreaks" in the elementary schools were among adults only. And the major high school outbreak occurred after the mask mandate was lifted due to a heat wave. Also, if you carefully look at the reports of day care outbreaks in our country, most appear to be involving staff that infect each other and, if kids are affected they are infected by the adults and are asymptomatic/have mild disease. I challenge you all to look at the articles coming from the popular press with the above data in mind and you will be surprised in the elementary age group that the adults appear to be the ones responsible for the outbreaks (though it is hard to get all of the info from those articles) and the ones who are severely affected by the disease.

--What are the bottom lines?

1. Kids 13-14 and below (likely around puberty) do not appear to be driving the spread of COVID. They rarely (one can never say never) transmit the disease. Tracing the source case with 100% certainty can be very challenging, but the data overall indicate pediatric transmission to be quite rare compared with adults.

2. Kids up to 18 years of age tend to get mild disease if any symptoms and death in this age group is less likely than getting hit by lightning. (though as we see higher prevalence in the US, the numbers will be rising)

3. In school settings, adults can and will give to adults and kids, so teachers need to be socially distancing while at work. Adults also should be wearing masks and getting tested and staying home if they have symptoms.

4. Data and guidelines from Holland suggest distancing among children <14 may not be necessary. And reopening of schools in Scandinavia has been successful even without children wearing masks. It should be pointed out that these countries opened schools as the FIRST step of reopening their economy and as stated above, the wearing of masks in elementary schools by students could further decrease any risk of transmission in the US.

5. I have previously discussed the many downsides of not having kids in school in person this fall: further entrenching socioeconomic disparities, job loss for parents who can't afford childcare worsening poverty and neglect, abuse of children (which will be underreported), lack of support for children with special needs, anxiety, depression and lack of physical activity and peer relationships in children. The list goes on and on. But I want this post to focus more on the science of the disease so it can inform our public policy decisions.

6. I hope the above data are reassuring. The more we know, the better we can tackle and live with this disease.

Edit: Now that this post has been shared hundreds, scratch that, thousands of times (never imagined this), I want to say first of all, that I in no way am intending to detract from the seriousness of COVID-19. It is imperative our country get this disease under control -by social distancing, closing indoor businesses which are not essential and wearing masks, but the above data at least suggest to me that children are not driving the pandemic; adults are. And I also want to say that a lot of what I shared above was recently discussed in the UCSF combined Medicine and Pediatric Grand Rounds lecture (an inspiration for me to write this to get this scientific info to the public). I encourage anyone interested in the above data to watch this recording of the Grand Rounds : https://www.youtube.com/watch…

And this article about the above UCSF physicians' stances on reopening schools and transmission in children: https://missionlocal.org/…/ucsf-medical-grand-rounds-the-d…/

I welcome any data or questions you have. The science about COVID in pediatrics is evolving and we don't have all the answers (far from it), but I hope people can use the above data to help them make informed decisions about children's activities and school openings.

Now, I ask yourself as you are reading this to consider: Is elementary school an "essential service" at least where there are working parents? All other first world countries seem to realize that you can not open the economy until kids have somewhere to go (and preferably learn and be familiar and comfortable with the place!). When one considers the number of couples or single parents who are essential workers, or now working again in the US, with kids too young to watch themselves - I ask you- where will they go if not to school? And will the alternative be better? Children of working parents do need to be cared for (this is why many day cares and summer schools have been open up to this point). We as a society need to do a risk calculation together and decide, based on the science, where the best place for these children is (school vs. day care vs. being left alone vs parents quitting their jobs) and who should take on the risks of caring for them/teaching them (teachers vs. day care workers vs. school proctors (as they are doing in Arizona), etc)? We also need to consider in this calculation what the short and long term risks are of kids NOT being in school (loss of learning, inability to report abuse, neglect, loss of school meals, exercise, social interaction, inability to escape poverty, loss of individualized education plans for children with special needs). It is our job together as American people to figure out what is in the best interest of all our children (regardless of socioeconomic status) - they are truly the future of our country and figuring how to open schools safely is infinitely more important than reopening Disney World (WHY is this open??). Will we in the future look back and say we did right by our children by keeping them out of school for COVID? I hope we can use the above data and strategies of other countries (as well as our own YMCA daycares!) that have successfully managed this pandemic to guide us. Whatever we decide as a society, it needs to be science-based and with our children's bests interests at the center.

*********************************************************

Edit to add new data:

7/16: In Germany, a study of over 2,000 children: "Scientists from Dresden Technical University said they believe children may act as a “brake” on chains of infection." https://news.yahoo.com/german-study-finds-no-evidence-16470…

7/16: Study performed by the Swedish and Finish Ministries of Health "closure or not of schools had no measurable direct impact on the number of laboratory confirmed cases in school-aged children in Finland or Sweden. The negative effects of closing schools must be weighed against the positive indirect effects it might have on the mitigation of the covid-19 pandemic." https://www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/…/covid-19-school-aged-…

*******************************************************

7/19

Per the CDC as of 7/15 for time period 2/1/2020 - 7/11/2020
# of COVID deaths ages 1-14 is 22
# of influenza deaths ages 1-14 is 87

In newborns 0-1 the numbers are much closer: 9 for COVID vs 14 for influenza.

An important thing to point out is we are missing the denominator for these calculations. It will be a challenge to determine the death rate of COVID until we know how many total cases there are and with many ages 1-14 suspected of being asymptomatic, this will be a challenge, and the true death rate for this population will probably need to come from a country that has done EXTENSIVE population-based testing which is not based on symptoms. Keep in mind that unless hospitals are completely full that disease prevalence in a country should not affect mortality rate.

https://data.cdc.gov/…/Provisional-COVID-19-Deat…/9bhg-hcku…

This study from France (https://www.medrxiv.org/…/10…/2020.06.25.20140178v2.full.pdf) looked at 3 students in primary school with COVID-19 while in school and they did extensive contact tracing and found these students went on to pass the disease to 0/1047 pupils and 0/51 teachers.

I also want to touch on the South Korean study that was mentioned in the New York times (https://www.nytimes.com/…/coronavirus-children-schools.html…). This was a nice, large study which found in the 10 and younger age group the following amounts of transmission: 1% for non-household contacts
5% for household contacts
This age group also made up only 6% of the total cases in the population.

However, the important caveat with the study (https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/10/20-1315_article) is they state "we could not determine the direction of transmission" (meaning they could not determine if it was the child who transmitted to the adult or vice versa). So instead of more rigorous contact tracing, as in the French study above, they did the following: "Because we could not determine direction of transmission, we calculated the proportion of detected cases by the equation [number of detected cases/number of contacts traced] × 100, excluding the index patient".

Using a calculation such as this as a substitute more rigorous contact tracing could result in an overestimate of the number of transmissions from the youngest group, if this group truly had few to no actual transmissions. So, this South Korean study, while large, does need to be looked at with this limitation in mind and in the context of the other studies that have been done in this age group. The South Korean study does reaffirm what has already sadly been found in previous studies, which is "older" children seem to transmit as efficiently as adults. The problem is, previous data have suggested this change to adult-like transmission likely occurs between the ages of 12 and 14, so it would be really nice to see a sub-analysis of the 10-13 or 10-14 year olds in the final version of this study (what is published is a "pre-print"). I suspect because the study was designed in March that the data were not available yet to suggest they should do that subgroup analysis.

7/25

Mark Woolhouse, infectious disease epidemiologist at Edinburgh University, "Scientists are yet to find a single confirmed case of a teacher catching coronavirus from a pupil anywhere in the world." Hopefully the data from his statement are forthcoming (https://www.thetimes.co.uk/…/school-closures-a-mistake-as-n…).

Now FINALLY, thanks to everyone for keeping me up to date with the latest studies. And thank you for all of the personal messages. This post is still far from comprehensive and definitely not perfect. I would love to turn this into a peer reviewed article with other authors and reviewers helping me see beyond my own biases (we all have biases and that is why both team work and the peer review process are SO IMPORTANT in science; right now this is nothing more than a Facebook post and I am the first to admit it). If anyone is interested in working with the data here and anything else we can find for possible publication, please reach out.



The Crime of Vaccination: Or Bacteria, X.Y.Z.
1913.  


Germ theory has been a fraud from the very beginning yet we're still being "vaccinated" based on the foundation of Pasteur's lies.
See this video clip for a quick overview of the fraud of Louis Pasteur, as was fully confirmed when his private diaries were publicly released in the late 20th century:
https://youtu.be/3cnlynJZLtM?t=2251
SCIENTIFIC FACTS:
1) No "virus" harmful to humans has ever been proven to exist.
2) You can't make a "vaccine" for something you can't even prove exists.
CONCLUSION
3) The fraud of "vaccination" has never been more than a tool to weaken and control us.
How we've been deceived:
- Virologist Stefan Lanka PhD, "Dismantling the Virus Theory":
https://wissenschafftplus.de/…/Dismantling-the-Virus-Theory…
- If "deadly viruses" actually existed, then they wouldn't have to commit scientific fraud to "prove" it!
https://youtu.be/fpTUlPLVtE0?t=185
Beware of "pied pipers"!
Bigtree, Buttar, Mikovits, Shiva, RFK etc. are "controlled opposition", employed to keep you from learning the truth that "deadly viruses" do not exist. Their job is to mislead you into accepting "safer vaccines". There's no solution for us there; we still get jabbed.
We were all fooled with the myth of "contagion" but that's *all* it is! Here's one famous failed attempt to "prove" it: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10158239436022838&set=a.10150122184637838&type=3&theater
Even siamese twins can't even pass a disease to each other!
https://www.facebook.com/paul.swanson.3701/posts/10158295750057838
Still believe science has your best interests at heart? Sorry to burst the bubble but here's exactly how they've corrupted all its branches, including medicine!
https://www.facebook.com/paul.swanson.3701/posts/10158253552607838
What we're seeing right now has been a *very* long time in the making; they announced it plenty but we weren't listening:
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10158325011092838&set=a.10150122184637838&type=3&theater







Image may contain: 2 people, text



I am writing to urge you to reopen our schools, businesses and public spaces before May 18. 

 I’m sure that you’re aware that your constituents are suffering immensely:
- Many are without employment and have no way to provide for themselves and their families. They live each day in constant worry.
 - Some have had to close businesses that they poured their hearts and souls into building and sustaining. Their hopes and dreams have been shattered.   
- Some have relatives who are elderly or fatally ill whom they can’t visit and who will ultimately end up dying alone. This can lead to overwhelming grief and trauma. 
- Some are not getting needed medical care, and others are being refused life-saving medical treatments by hospitals that are reserving medical supplies for COVID patients. 
- Many are crippled with fear and anxiety over constant news reports about coronavirus, the possibility of death, and a shortage of hospital beds, supplies and treatments for those who fall ill. 

 Despair, depression and devastation are widespread — be it from job losses, isolation, a lack of support systems, the erosion of fundamental freedoms of healthy, law-abiding citizens, and uncertainty over what the future holds. Staggering unemployment statistics and the loss in GDP alone cannot measure the degree of mass human suffering and the devastating impact stay-at-home orders have had on the human spirit. 

 Projections by the Imperial College London — which were later retracted because they were vastly exaggerated — were used to justify the shutdown of our country, affecting the lives of hundreds of millions of healthy Americans. The model’s authors went on to acknowledge that two-thirds of the people projected to die from COVID-19 would have died with or without the infection due to the vast prevalence of chronic disease and related co-morbidities. Citizens now know that the real numbers and risks from COVID-19 are dramatically different. As such, the proportionate government response must also be dramatically different. 

 It’s extremely troubling that data upon which life-and-death decisions are being made is inaccurate and methodologically flawed. Both the US health statistics agency and the World Health Organization have announced that the certification of “deaths by COVID-19” requires zero proof that the virus is the cause of death. As a result, the official death statistics attributed to COVID-19 do not require cases to be positively confirmed through virus testing. Merely “suspected” cases of COVID-19 are being included in the official numbers. 

 I understand that your office holds very broad police powers during times of emergency. It is your responsibility to implement safety measures to protect all citizens during a declared emergency. In the best interest of our families and your voters, those powers must be used wisely. Public health policies are not intended to, nor will they ever be able to, provide individual or collective health. Public health policies have a proper role in society to shape a landscape conducive to achieving health: clean air; clean water; properly functioning sanitation systems; solid infrastructure; and education and resources on hygiene, nutrition and food preservation standards. It’s not the government’s role to guarantee health or to privilege certain lives over others. It is the government’s role to protect voters’ fundamental freedoms, including the freedom to worship and to provide for their families, without state interference.  

 Closing all schools and public spaces; closing all “non-essential” businesses; mandating that healthy, law-abiding citizens stay at home; and imposing other extreme measures has created widespread devastation. The more than 17 million people who have filed for unemployment over the past few weeks far surpasses anything we saw during the Great Recession of 2008 when 6.6 million people lost their jobs. The shutdown must end by May 1, when more than 26 million individuals are projected to be unemployed. 

 The constant perpetuation of the fear of grave sickness and death must be lifted to return communities back to a state of functioning. 

I urge you to re-open our state’s schools and businesses by May 1. Please implement commonsense policies to protect the vulnerable while restoring people’s livelihoods and mitigating the real costs associated with shutting down schools and businesses. I implore you to allow healthy individuals to return to work so that our jobs, our economy and the well-being of men and women are not destroyed.

 Thank you in advance for taking these bold steps and putting measures in place that serve the best interests of the people. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts